On Wed, Oct 01, 2025 at 04:13:20AM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Tue, 30 Sept 2025 at 14:53, Robie Basak <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 26, 2025 at 07:57:17PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > > That's a good point. If fastrpc is split into three daemon packages, > > > then each daemon package should 'Suggests: hexagon-dsp-binaries-Ndsp', > > > where 'N' is one of 'a', 'c', 'g' or 's', for each kind of DSPs. > > > > > > WDYT? I can implement that straight away. > > > > I have quite a bit to say on this, but to make progress, let's get > > hexagon-dsp-binaries package uploaded first. We don't need the virtual > > packages until something is going into Debian that depends on them. This > > will probably be fastrpc, and I have an ITP filed for that now, but I'm > > not yet ready for a Debian upload. > > The 'hexagonrpcd' package is already a part of Debian.
It doesn't depend on hexagon-dsp-binaries at the moment though, and won't be able to until it moves to unstable. So I don't think we need to resolve this yet. I don't think the structure of hexagon-dsp-binaries binary packages will change. I don't think there's any harm or wasted effort in uploading to experimental now to make some progress on this, if that's OK with you? > Is the following PR enough from your POV? If it looks good, I will merge it. > > https://github.com/linux-msm/hexagon-dsp-binaries/pull/18 FTR, I acked the PR directly and Dmitry merged it. > > What I'd like is for the Debian ftpmasters to find, when they review, > > that all is in order with everything being stated in debian/copyright > > precisely and unambiguously matching what is claimed by upstream in the > > source tree itself (preferably verifiable using the licensecheck tool). Are you planning to use a new upstream release to pick up explicit licensing of WHENCE before we upload hexagon-dsp-binaries to experimental? This would avoid a possible review iteration for Debian ftpmaster review I think. I missed some source and/or pedantic lintian tags on previous reviews. This was my fault, so in an effort to minimise pain for you I've provided fixes for all of them at https://salsa.debian.org/rbasak/hexagon-dsp-binaries/-/commits/initial-fixes, together with one README.Debian catch-up from review changes. Please take a look and check if you are happy with them. If you are happy to integrate those changes then I think the packaging is ready for experimental now, with just your thoughts on a new upstream release first as above. Robie
