Sounds good, I’ll take a look! On Aug 9, 2025 at 10:10:24 AM, Johan Walles <[email protected]> wrote:
> I have now renamed the project to moor, could you have another look? > > https://github.com/walles/moor > > A release is out for the new name: > > https://github.com/walles/moor/releases/tag/v2.0.0 > > The RFP is still mostly valid. Except Highlight isn't a dependency any > more, moor is using another Go package for that nowadays: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=944035 > > Regards /Johan > > Den tors 7 aug. 2025 kl 20:22 skrev Stephen Gelman <[email protected]>: > >> Ah yeah good catch re: the name >> >> On Aug 7, 2025 at 1:10:40 PM, Nilesh Patra <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> No, I think using conflicts here is wrong. >>> >>> See https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s-binaries >>> >>> On 07/08/25 11:14 pm, Johan Walles wrote: >>> >>> How about marking moar and the other package as Conflicts with each >>> other? >>> >>> >>> >>> https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#conflicting-binary-packages-conflicts >>> >>> >>> "Conflicts should be used when two packages provide the same file and >>> will >>> >>> continue to do so," >>> >>> >>> I would guess the number of people who want both should be a small >>> group... >>> >>> >>> Since moar has been out longer than moarvm and has more users, I think >>> not >>> >>> having moar in Debian would be unfortunate. >>> >>> >>> Regards /Johan >>> >>> >>> Den tors 7 aug. 2025 kl 19:13 skrev Guillem Jover <[email protected]>: >>> >>> >>> > Hi! >>> >>> > >>> >>> > On Thu, 2025-08-07 at 12:09:55 -0400, Stephen Gelman wrote: >>> >>> >> On Aug 7, 2025 at 8:34:21 AM, Johan Walles <[email protected]> >>> >>> > wrote: >>> >>> >>> Would you please consider packaging the moar pager (written in Go >>> >>> >>> obviously)? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> It has 800+ stars on GitHub: >>> >>> >>> https://github.com/walles/moar/ >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> There's an RFP open: >>> >>> >>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=944035 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Is this something you think you could take on? >>> >>> > >>> >>> >> Sure, I’d be happy to take this on. It looks pretty straightforward, >>> but >>> >>> >> I’ll let you know if I run into any issues. >>> >>> > >>> >>> > Unfortunately this project would conflict with the already present >>> >>> > package moarvm, which also provides /usr/bin/moar. >>> >>> > >>> >>> > I'm afraid this new package would need its program to be renamed to be >>> >>> > accepted into Debian (I guess ideally both the project and program >>> name), >>> >>> > which can be a tall ask for a project that has existed for a while. :/ >>> >>> > >>> >>> > (Alternatively you could try to convince the upstream moarvm project >>> >>> > to rename their binary and shared library to moarvm, but unless that >>> >>> > happens, the moar program name should not be used by any other package >>> >>> > with a different functionality/interface.) >>> >>> > >>> >>> > Thanks, >>> >>> > Guillem >>> >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>>
