> On 7/9/25 10:33, Traut Manuel LCPF-CH wrote: > > Thanks for your feedback! > > > > > Am 8. Juli 2025 21:45:32 MESZ schrieb Manuel Traut <manuel.tr...@mt.com>: > > > > Description : Embedded systems control for testing > > > > > > I'm a nonnative speaker, but I read this as: > > > a "system(s) control" that is "embedded" and can be used for "testing" > > > ... (missing noun) > > > > > > I naively break this down to describe a desktop widget (*embedded* into > > > the taskbar) to control some undefined testing (or it probably is just > > > targeting Debian/testing). > > > > > > maybe the description can be improved like: > > > "control for testing embedded systems" > > > > What about: > > Control system for software testing on real hardware > > > hmm. i mostly test my software on real hardware (i consider my laptop real > physical hardware).
..a lot of people also use containers, VMs.. but that's not suitable for all kind of tests. E.g. testing device drivers, or kernel device tree, bootloaders, real-time performance of a system, io benchmarks, .. > and what is "control system"? (but on re-reading my proposal: yes, "control > system" is probably better than just "control".) > > to avoid repeated words, how about: > "Control framework for software testing on embedded systems" > or > "Control system for software testing on embedded hardware" ..it's really hard to describe this in one short sentence: Software stack to manage, access and control devices under test. cheers Manuel
