Hi Maytham,
I wonder if you have seen the rejection from the FTP Masters, and if you
were planning to continue working on this package?
In case you missed it, this was the rejection message:
===
please mention all licenses and copyright holder in your debian/coypright.
I found at least files licensed under the Apache license.
Some files contain text like:
Code generated by @autorest/go. DO NOT EDIT.
Please also provide the sources where these files are generated from.
At least explain how these files can be generated with tools from Debian.
===
Tina
On 16/02/2025 19:35, Martina Ferrari wrote:
Hi,
Since the freeze is approaching fast, and there are a few packages
waiting on the new Azure package to clear the NEW queue, I went ahead
and uploaded it.
Maytham: since you've done 99% of the work, I left your name in the
changelog and so it is technically an sponsored upload. Let me know if
you'd like me to give you maintainer permissions to upload the package
directly in the future.
Thanks for all your work, and I hope you don't mind me rushing this.
On 16/02/2025 12:40, Félix Sipma wrote:
Hi,
I was waiting for an answer from Maytham before spending more time on
the package, but I think everyone just want to have a functional -dev
package in sid. The sooner we have it the better.
Please upload!
Thanks,
On 2025-02-15 20:12+0000, Martina Ferrari wrote:
Hi all,
I have not been involved in this discussion so far, but I am also
eagerly waiting for this to be uploaded as it is needed for prometheus.
I have spent some time on the package today, reworked it to comply
with the team standard workflow and fixed a couple of small bugs.
I have not touched the existing branches (debian/latest and upstream/
latest), instead I have used debian/sid and upstream/main (following
upstream git history), and dropped the usage of pristine-tar.
It compiles cleanly and it is ready for upload, please let me know if
you would like me to do it, or if you prefer to do it yourself.
On 31/01/2025 15:32, Félix Sipma wrote:
On 2025-01-21 14:50+0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
Is the 'upstream' branch really matching the 'pristine-tar' tarball
content? Seems like Salsa CI pipeline isn't happy:
https://salsa.debian.org/jas/golang-github-azure-azure-sdk-for-go-
sdk/-/jobs/6963283
I get the same locally, seems like a CRLF ending issue.
jas@kaka:~/dpkg/golang-github-azure-azure-sdk-for-go-sdk$ ls -
la .config/1espt/PipelineAutobaseliningConfig.yml
-rw-rw-r-- 1 jas jas 407 jan 21 14:47 .config/1espt/
PipelineAutobaseliningConfig.yml
jas@kaka:~/dpkg/golang-github-azure-azure-sdk-for-go-sdk$ tar
tvfa ../ golang-github-azure-azure-sdk-for-go-
sdk_0.0~git20250119.28095e43.orig.tar.xz |grep 1espt
drwxrwxr-x root/root 0 2025-01-19 07:24 golang-github-
azure- azure-sdk-for-go-sdk-0.0~git20250119.28095e43/.config/1espt/
-rw-rw-r-- root/root 409 2025-01-19 07:24 golang-github-
azure- azure-sdk-for-go-sdk-0.0~git20250119.28095e43/.config/1espt/
PipelineAutobaseliningConfig.yml
jas@kaka:~/dpkg/golang-github-azure-azure-sdk-for-go-sdk$
/Simon
Hi,
I also had the same problem: Maytham, it seems you modified
PipelineAutobaseliningConfig.yml. After restoring the file, the
packaged build fine (I just had to resize my /tmp from 8G to 12.8G).
restic seems to build fine with its "disable azure" patch off and
with golang-github-azure-azure-sdk-for-go-sdk-dev added to B-D.
I'm glad a lot of Go packages may be updated before the freeze!
Could you please restore this file and upload to NEW?
Thanks!
--
Martina Ferrari
