Your message dated Thu, 7 Oct 2004 15:12:01 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#218369: duplication of effort?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Oct 2003 21:36:36 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 30 15:36:35 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from trofast.sesse.net [129.241.93.32]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AFKT5-000652-00; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 15:36:35 -0600
Received: from root by trofast.sesse.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1AFKT3-0008L7-00; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 22:36:33 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ITP: ati-glx -- ATI binary XFree86 4.x driver
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 22:36:33 +0100
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_28
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_28
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : ati-glx
Version : 3.2.8
Upstream Author : ATI Technologies
* URL : http://www.schneider-digital.de/html/body_download_ati.html
* License : ATI proprietary
Description : ATI binary XFree86 4.x driver
I intend to package ATIs binary XFree86 drivers in a manner similar to
the nvidia-glx package (probably using it as a base) for Debian. I've
talked to ATI about this, and they seem positive -- however, the package
itself currently includes no license at all (ie. nothing that permits
redistribution), and they had to check with legal to fix that. (It will
of course have to go into non-free no matter what the license is, as the
drivers are binary-only.) So, until I get an answer from ATI, it cannot
be packaged, but I hope to get a positive reply from them.
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux trofast.sesse.net 2.4.22 #7 Fri Sep 5 00:09:43 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO8859-1
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 218369-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Oct 2004 13:12:05 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 07 06:12:05 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from trofast.sesse.net [129.241.93.32]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CFY3x-00065Q-00; Thu, 07 Oct 2004 06:12:05 -0700
Received: from sesse by trofast.sesse.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CFY3t-000190-00; Thu, 07 Oct 2004 15:12:01 +0200
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 15:12:01 +0200
From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#218369: duplication of effort?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Operating-System: Linux 2.6.6 on a i686
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040818i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 08:36:33PM +0800, Pabs wrote:
> dpkg in #debian mentions the following [1]. Just wondering if you have
> both packaged the same thing.
>
> 1. http://xoomer.virgilio.it/flavio.stanchina/debian/fglrx-installer.html
I'm fully aware of the package, although it surfaced after I began my
efforts. In short, I don't use my own packages anymore, I use fglrx-installer
:-)
I'm closing the ITP; it makes little sense for me to keep it open given
ATI's slowness and the existence of fglrx-installer. (I should probably
contact Flavio to see about getting fglrx-installer into contrib, but that's
another matter.)
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
