On Sun, 2004-10-03 at 21:32 -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote: > I'm open to input on whether or not the source package should just be > called vips given this explanation. Thanks!
No, that sounds great for me. I was just curious because of the name. I'm sorry if that didn't look in a polite way. Regards, -- David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://www.damog.net/ GPG 356E16CD - 84F0 E180 8AF6 E8D0 842F B520 63F3 08DB 356E 16CD