Le Tue, 21 Jan 2025 17:53:48 +0400, Ilyas Gasanov <torso.n...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> In this case, can I ask you to create a Request For Adoption (RFA) on > WNPP channel, so that other potential maintainers would be able to > take note of this? Mono is already listed on https://wiki.debian.org/LowThresholdAdoption The main reason there is no RFA yet is that there are still many things I want to fix in the current packaging (it accumulated many problems over the years). Since I took over its maintenance I’ve been working on fixing them, my current priority order being: 1. Fix the problems reported on https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/mono 2. Switch to the new upstream maintained by the WINE team 3. Remove *unused* binary packages to reduce the maintenance scope (anything with reverse dependencies or reverse build-dependencies is going to stay) Of course, even without having submitted this package explicitly for adoption, I would be more than happy to see other people joining the maintenance of the mono source package. If they have objectives different than mine it’s not a problem, on the contrary: each co-maintainer could then focus on the parts they really care about. I think there is a wnpp report category more appropriate when asking for co-maintainers… Maybe RFH?
pgpZOm0ompTSY.pgp
Description: Signature digitale OpenPGP
