Quoting Alexandre Rossi (2024-08-12 09:58:59) > Issues/questions: > > uwsgidecorators.py would make sense in this package but is not > provided by uwsgi-src. OK to add it?
Yes: Anything needed for plugin/module packages should be included in uwsgi-src package. > My packaging only builds for the default python version. Should we > plan for multiple python versions supported in sid? My view on this is > to wait for the need to arise. If ok with this, src:uwsgi should > probably clean out all the alternatives provided. You view on this? I used to strongly favor offering each available version, but nowadays I don't really care, so if you prefer to reduce to a single non-versioned package then go ahead - but yes, then be careful to handle the migration (personally I would find it simpler to *continue* with versioned packages now that it has been established already, but I leave the choice to you). > greenlet should be restricted to some archs, looking into that and > considering specific source package. Advice? I recommend to use the same method that I have used. For simpler tracking of only one arch-variability, see link-grammar: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/link-grammar/-/blob/debian/latest/debian/rules If you still find my approach bad, then I am curious to learn why - perhaps that's easier to discuss in a live chat? > Please bring up any other comment you might have. You might consider adding support for pypy3, and close bug#732019. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ * Sponsorship: https://ko-fi.com/drjones [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
