Your message dated Wed, 24 Sep 2003 09:40:20 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line package already adopted
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Apr 2003 15:35:13 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 12 10:35:13 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl027-162-238.atl1.dsl.speakeasy.net (abelard.kenzoid.com)
[216.27.162.238]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 194N29-000760-00; Sat, 12 Apr 2003 10:35:13 -0500
Received: by abelard.kenzoid.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id F25E82F31; Sat, 12 Apr 2003 11:34:39 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ken Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ITA: gadfly
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10.1
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 11:34:38 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-04-12
Severity: normal
I'll pick up gadfly. It's right up my alley, and I've been looking for
something to start the NM process (I'm not yet a DD). I'll start on
repackaging ASAP; it appears that we're up to date (according to the
SF project page), but I'll doublecheck with upstream.
Obviously, I'll also need a sponsor...I'll post again to
debian-mentors once I've finished packaging.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux abelard 2.4.18-386 #2 Sun Apr 14 10:38:08 EST 2002 i586
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 188717-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Sep 2003 07:42:02 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 24 02:41:55 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A24Ha-000475-00; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 02:41:54 -0500
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA09202
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 09:40:20 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.9+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id h8O7eKU6006482;
Wed, 24 Sep 2003 09:40:20 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 09:40:20 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: package already adopted
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_90
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_21
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_21
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
The package was already adopted by me in the past. closing the report.
Matthias
