On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 08:22:33PM -0400, Streph Treadway wrote: > On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 10:49:52PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > You have expressed in bug report #93868 [0] the intent to adopt > > the package "dome". The last comment to this from you is dated from > > 4 Feb 2003, which is more than six months ago. Do you still intent to adopt > > this package? If not, please retitle the bug, substituting "O:" for "ITA:". > > Hi, Frank, > > Yes, I do still intend to adopt dome. The most recent upstream version > (4.80) is already in the archive thanks to an NMU by the QA team in > January. There are no open bugs against the package. The upstream > author is working on a new release. I intend to package this when it is > available. Until then, I did not believe a new Debian package was > necessary.
It's OK to upload a package with no changes other than "New maintainer". In fact, that's better than leaving it maintained by the QA group; it saves us in QA from getting confused and accidentally doing work on it unnecessarily, and it means that bug reports go to you rather than to us. Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
