Your message dated Thu, 14 Aug 2003 21:12:34 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Please remove wmfinder from experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Dec 2000 08:45:19 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 22 02:45:19 2000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from spmler1.mail.eds.com [194.128.225.190] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 149NpG-0006p5-00; Fri, 22 Dec 2000 02:45:19 -0600
Received: from nnse.eds.com ([192.168.1.1])
        by spmler1.mail.eds.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id eBM8lst11081
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 22 Dec 2000 08:47:55 GMT
Received: from nnse.eds.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by nnse.eds.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id eBM8jAo17274
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 22 Dec 2000 08:45:10 GMT
Received: from katmandu.tibet.libre ([204.104.17.69])
        by nnse.eds.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id eBM8j7T17213
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 22 Dec 2000 08:45:08 GMT
Received: from quique by katmandu.tibet.libre with local (Exim 3.20 #1 (Debian))
        id 149Nlr-000051-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 22 Dec 2000 09:41:47 +0100
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2000 09:41:47 +0100
From: Quique <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RFP: wmfinder -- Nice file manager for WindowMaker
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Sender: Quique <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

Wmfinder is an easy to use mac-like file manager, which fits in well with 
WindowMaker.

HomePage: http://www.imago.ro/wmfinder

License: GNU GPL v.2

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 80278-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Aug 2003 19:20:37 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 14 14:20:35 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from psionic.psi5.com [213.133.118.146] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 19nNe6-0003c2-00; Thu, 14 Aug 2003 14:20:26 -0500
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by psionic.psi5.com (8.11.6/8.11.6/SuSE Linux 0.5) with UUCP id 
h7EJKLI28825;
        Thu, 14 Aug 2003 21:20:21 +0200
Received: from geier by localhost with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
        id 19nNWV-0003fz-00; Thu, 14 Aug 2003 21:12:35 +0200
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 21:12:34 +0200
From: Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
   [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Please remove wmfinder from experimental
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KsGdsel6WgEHnImy"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-14.3 required=4.0
        tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,USER_AGENT_MUTT
        version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)


--KsGdsel6WgEHnImy
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: wishlist

Hi,

could you please remove wmfinder from experimental? The package didn't
survive the conversion from Qt 1.45 to Qt 2 too well, I don't want to
port it to Qt 3, upstream has vanished and the RFPer doesn't have any
strong feelings about that package anymore.

   Simon

--=20
GPG Fingerprint: 040E B5F7 84F1 4FBC CEAD  ADC6 18A0 CC8D 5706 A4B4

--KsGdsel6WgEHnImy
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/O98hGKDMjVcGpLQRAupNAKCc6nCZ30+frpUY6nb9qJwpx5YjTQCdGfxj
0chP+HKtCLA44c3qwge5J14=
=Hymg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--KsGdsel6WgEHnImy--

Reply via email to