> > [binutils-or1k-elf] build-depends on gcc-10-source. > Do you mean binutils-source here?
Of course. Copy/paste error from the similar ITP bug for gcc-ork1k-elf. > > * Package name : binutils-or1k-elf > I am wondering whether it is a good idea to package this separately from > binutils. Even though you don't run Linux on the or1k, there is a Debian > architecture for it (as you could do that). The or1k support in binutils > is mainlined, so I think it would be quite simple to enable or1k support > in the main binutils source package. It's a very simple change there. The maintainers of the 'binutils' .dsc package deliberately support a limited set of targets. Outside this set, separate .dsc packages are recommended (even without patches) so that an issue affecting an architecture does not block all other ones.
