Your message dated Tue, 29 Jul 2003 00:04:15 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#202254: fixed in acheck-rules 0.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jul 2003 09:27:18 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 21 04:27:16 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from postfix3-2.free.fr [213.228.0.169]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19eWwu-0003E0-00; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 04:27:16 -0500
Received: from bertol (lns-th2-10-82-64-158-236.adsl.proxad.net [82.64.158.236])
by postfix3-2.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EF46C10E
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 11:27:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from nico by bertol with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 19eWwt-0001RC-00; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 11:27:15 +0200
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 11:27:14 +0200
From: Nicolas Bertolissio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ITP: acheck-rules -- Basic rules for acheck
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.18
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MUTT,X_DEBBUGS_CC
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-21
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : acheck-rules
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Nicolas Bertolissio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://nico.bertol.free.fr/acheck-rules/index.html
* License : GPL
Description : Basic rules for acheck
* Package name : acheck
Description : Check common localisation mistakes
This package provides basic rules to be checked by the acheck script.
.
It also contains the manpages for rules files.
This is already packaged at the above URL.
I am waiting for DAM approval with another package (ddtc), and I have
already found a sponsor for this one.
Other ITP acheck-rules and acheck-rules-fr are related to this one of
course.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux bertol 2.4.20 #3 SMP sam fév 15 16:58:20 CET 2003 i686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 202254-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jul 2003 04:05:49 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 28 23:05:49 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19hLkD-0001JV-00; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 23:05:49 -0500
Received: from rdonald by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19hLih-0001cI-00; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 00:04:15 -0400
From: Nicolas Bertolissio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.23 $
Subject: Bug#202254: fixed in acheck-rules 0.2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Randall Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 00:04:15 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
acheck-rules, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
acheck-rules_0.2.dsc
to pool/main/a/acheck-rules/acheck-rules_0.2.dsc
acheck-rules_0.2.tar.gz
to pool/main/a/acheck-rules/acheck-rules_0.2.tar.gz
acheck-rules_0.2_all.deb
to pool/main/a/acheck-rules/acheck-rules_0.2_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Nicolas Bertolissio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated acheck-rules
package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 02:11:04 +0200
Source: acheck-rules
Binary: acheck-rules
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Nicolas Bertolissio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Nicolas Bertolissio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
acheck-rules - Basic rules for acheck
Closes: 202254
Changes:
acheck-rules (0.2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* entering Debian archive (closes: bug#202254)
* clean `debian/' directory
- remove empty `README.Debian'
- add `Build-Depends-Indep: perl
- improve description
- clean `rules'
thanks to Denis Barbier for all these
Files:
9d13e809f6b4d198497fa284ae2dc2c4 520 text optional acheck-rules_0.2.dsc
8d51c509411c74532957950d8c2dd70c 8263 text optional acheck-rules_0.2.tar.gz
dd637cd4874ddd1169d1bef6b8af53d9 12890 text optional acheck-rules_0.2_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/Hig98Ri1lR4WGvsRArZKAKCJ0kWvbCNCfu/vcpfXVMcwWMOaVwCeICsS
0tcU5R9UwmohJke6LIBnl0s=
=b6Bx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
