Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

Hi,

In #951508, the current maintainer of lmod wrote:

On 17/02/20 at 19:49 +0100, Aaron Zauner wrote:
> Since I'm barely keeping this package updated I'd suggest that you use the
> upstream Lmod project source with the dependencies that come with this
> package, you'll get more bug fixes, Performance and features out of it in a
> production environment. That's what we used to do on live HPC systems since
> a lot of software needs to be built by hand outside of the distro packaging
> anyway.

And then:

On 15/09/20 at 12:32 +0200, Aaron Zauner (azet) wrote:
> If anyone wants to take over I'm more than fine with that. The amount
> of work I have at the moment barely permits me from maintaining
> projects. It's most sensible that someone actively using this project
> on Debian maintains it, as is, I'm not using it much anymore and am
> not working in HPC at the moment. The bug should definitely reported
> upstream. Upgrading the package should be fairly simple though - the
> dependencies are already in place, as are simple tests/git integration
> etc.: https://github.com/azet/lmod-deb

I'm thus opening this RFA bug to reflect this.

The package description is:
 Lmod is a Lua based module system that easily handles the MODULEPATH
 Hierarchical problem. Environment Modules provide a convenient way to
 dynamically change the users' environment through modulefiles. This
 includes easily adding or removing directories to the PATH environment
 variable. Modulefiles for Library packages provide environment variables
 that specify where the library and header files can be found.
 Lmod is a Lua based module system that easily handles the MODULEPATH
 Hierarchical problem. Environment Modules provide a convenient way to
 dynamically change the users' environment through modulefiles. This
 includes easily adding or removing directories to the PATH environment
 variable. Modulefiles for Library packages provide environment variables
 that specify where the library and header files can be found.

- Lucas

Reply via email to