Your message dated Thu, 17 Jul 2003 17:32:14 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#200458: fixed in libbsf-java 1:2.3.0rc1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jul 2003 11:51:29 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 08 06:51:27 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from n02p127.netcamp.se (chrystal.opal.dhs.org) [62.119.125.127]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19Zr0J-0001ac-00; Tue, 08 Jul 2003 06:51:27 -0500
Received: from ola by chrystal.opal.dhs.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 19Zr0I-00015v-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 08 Jul 2003 13:51:26 +0200
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 13:51:26 +0200
From: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RFA: libbsf-java
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
I would like someone to take over libbsf-java. I do not really
have the time for it.
It needs some more integration...
Regards,
// Ola
--
--------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD |
| +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
| http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 |
\ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
---------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 200458-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2003 21:35:12 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 17 16:35:11 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19dGP9-0004jB-00; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 16:35:11 -0500
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19dGMI-0002Ar-00; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 17:32:14 -0400
From: Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.34 $
Subject: Bug#200458: fixed in libbsf-java 1:2.3.0rc1-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 17:32:14 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libbsf-java, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
libbsf-java_2.3.0rc1-1.diff.gz
to pool/contrib/libb/libbsf-java/libbsf-java_2.3.0rc1-1.diff.gz
libbsf-java_2.3.0rc1-1.dsc
to pool/contrib/libb/libbsf-java/libbsf-java_2.3.0rc1-1.dsc
libbsf-java_2.3.0rc1-1_all.deb
to pool/contrib/libb/libbsf-java/libbsf-java_2.3.0rc1-1_all.deb
libbsf-java_2.3.0rc1.orig.tar.gz
to pool/contrib/libb/libbsf-java/libbsf-java_2.3.0rc1.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated libbsf-java package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 17:32:37 +0200
Source: libbsf-java
Binary: libbsf-java
Architecture: source all
Version: 1:2.3.0rc1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
libbsf-java - Bean Scripting Framework to support scripting languages in Java
Closes: 112684 124198 144015 144029 200458
Changes:
libbsf-java (1:2.3.0rc1-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release: 2.3.0 Release Candidate 1
* New maintainer (closes: #200458)
* Updated debian/copyright: New download location and license: Apache
Software License 1.1 instead of IBM Public License 1.0
* Build using Xalan 2 instead of Xalan 1 (closes: #144029), this makes
the dependency on Xerces 1 go away (closes: #144015)
* Enable support for Jython (closes: #112684) and JavaScript (closes:
#124198)
* Updated the package description from the home page
* Standards-Version: 3.6.0
+ Moved Build-Depends-Indep to Build-Depends since only Build-Depends
must be satisfied during clean
* Completely rewrote debian/rules, now uses debhelper 4
* Use dh-buildinfo to store information about the build system in the
package
Files:
d223cfec8c6c477fd4ca089751902227 693 contrib/libs optional
libbsf-java_2.3.0rc1-1.dsc
88a31cfb40cd75ae4f7b95a3d19b0ec7 204964 contrib/libs optional
libbsf-java_2.3.0rc1.orig.tar.gz
9186ae57a5d05fbbb257a7bc5e74f525 3813 contrib/libs optional
libbsf-java_2.3.0rc1-1.diff.gz
8fb35fb83a772a7953e9e72f1bcb4e32 182084 contrib/libs optional
libbsf-java_2.3.0rc1-1_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/FxEcCdoSgNrrJGsRApSZAKCVMreYwwgV61VvpJ+jilPJKf5v1ACcC25v
mGLQmUqWayBsU2FeVpVpM+Q=
=U3d3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
