On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 11:39, John-Paul Gignac wrote: > So, I just want to be clear on what exactly you need. I would be fine > with either renaming the debian directory as you suggested, or with > deleting it entirely. Are there any other changes that you would like? > Once I've done these changes, should I make a new release that > incorporates them? If so, is there a particular preferred naming format > for the release file?
Renaming or deleting is fine, yes. Also, your build script uses /bin/sh where it should use /bin/bash. Finally, your makefile works in /usr/share/pathological. The preferred directory would be /usr/share/games/pathologial. I haven't noticed anything else yet, but if I run across something working on the packaging, I'll let you know. A new release would probably be best. The naming format doesn't really matter, but my recommendation would be pathological-1.1.3. :) > Finally, do you know if there is any documentation available for Debian > package upstream maintainers? Nothing specifically for Debian upstream maintainers; obviously Debian Policy might have useful information in it, and there's some good advice in the GNU coding standards (not all of it, though). -- Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
