Hi josch! I am the upstream maintainer of codebase.
I do agree that the name is way too generic, but it is wanted: this tool is about managing codebase, and I didn't wanted to named it it a complex manner, I like this simplicity. Renaming the package to something like 'go-codebase' and keeping the executable named codebase would be acceptable? Cheers! -- Aloïs Micard (creekorful) <al...@micard.lu> GPG: DA4A A436 9BFA E299 67CD E85B F733 E871 0859 FCD2
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
