Your message dated Thu, 10 Jul 2003 19:42:44 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line (no subject)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Feb 2003 22:49:13 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 21 16:49:12 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from snot.cs.unm.edu [64.106.46.98] (foobar)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18mLyi-0007kC-00; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 16:49:12 -0600
Received: from bap by snot.cs.unm.edu with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18mLyF-0001H5-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 15:48:43 -0700
From: Barak Pearlmutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RFP ygraph
Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 15:48:43 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Package: wnpp
I've been maintaining xgraph, but it seems to have been superseded by
the superior ygraph, which provides similar functionality based on gtk
and without any problematic upstream branches with DFSG-unclear
patches.
It'd be great if someone else would package ygraph
http://www.aei.mpg.de/~pollney/ygraph/
It would be fine to coordinate adding a
suggests: ygraph
to xgraph, and gently encourage people to transfer over to ygraph.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 181978-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jul 2003 01:43:18 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 10 20:43:16 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from snot.cs.unm.edu [64.106.46.98]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19amwO-000111-00; Thu, 10 Jul 2003 20:43:16 -0500
Received: from bap by snot.cs.unm.edu with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19amvs-0002mm-00; Thu, 10 Jul 2003 19:42:44 -0600
From: Barak Pearlmutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Daniel Kobras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 19:42:44 -0600
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0
tests=none
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Good job, thanks for packaging it.
I will consider "suggests: ygraph" in the next xgraph upload.
--BAP.
