Hi Sean,
Sean Whitton wrote:
> After thinking about this a bit and reviewing old discussions, I think
> that using the alternatives mechanism is better than doing some sort of
> transition.
Indeed.
> I have prepared a patch to src:unclutter to implement that,
> and also I've prepared packaging of unclutter-xfixes which calls
> update-alternatives(1).
Yay, thanks! Will happily include that patch in unclutter.
> Although unclutter-xfixes will work better for a lot of people,
> classic unclutter is working perfectly fine for other people, and there
> seems no need to impose a transition on the second group if it's not
> needed to benefit the first.
I fully agree. Actually being happy with the old unclutter and never
having felt the urge to change its behaviour made me hesitate to
switch to unclutter-xfixes.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
`- | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
