On Mon, 2003-04-07 at 14:21, James Troup wrote: > Err, can we have something a little less namespace polluting than > "build-common"? Even "debian-build-common" is pushing it given how > it's rather uncommon and (if it's even as successful as DBS, dpatch > and cbs combined) likely to remain so for the forseeable future.
That's just it. If it isn't successful enough to merit the name, I will consider it a failure.
