Howdy Siddhesh, (Please reply in normal manner, by interleaving your responses and removing the parts you don't respond to. See the Posting Style article <URL:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style>.)
On 30-Jan-2017, Siddhesh Rane wrote: > Thanks for the suggestion. > The upstream github repo isn't much clear about what the package does > so I skipped the long description. The description is necessary for people to give feedback on your Intent To Package this work. > Besides I thought the bug filing procedure was fully automated so no > one would care about a missing long description. Who gave you that impression? I have never seen any Debian packaging documentation that would lead someone to believe the procedure is automated. Can you point me to what made you believe that? You are hoping to get a sponsor for this package, so I wonder if you already have someone in mind? Did you ask them about what it means to file an ITP report? > Do I need to file this bug again with a long description? No, but you should describe the package in this bug report so people can understand what it is you are intending to package and how you will describe it. -- \ “Choose mnemonic identifiers. If you can't remember what | `\ mnemonic means, you've got a problem.” —Larry Wall | _o__) | Ben Finney <bign...@debian.org>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
