Your message dated Fri, 17 Jan 2003 12:49:34 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line RFA: simulpic -- a Microchip PIC simulator
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Jul 2002 03:57:39 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 30 22:57:39 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from tomts14.bellnexxia.net (tomts14-srv.bellnexxia.net)
[209.226.175.35]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17ZkcF-0001fr-00; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 22:57:39 -0500
Received: from Nightbird.TZoNE.ORG ([65.92.164.224])
by tomts14-srv.bellnexxia.net
(InterMail vM.5.01.04.19 201-253-122-122-119-20020516) with ESMTP
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 23:58:00 -0400
Received: from hawkmoon (Hawkmoon.Local.TZoNE.ORG [192.168.1.10])
by Nightbird.TZoNE.ORG (Postfix) with ESMTP id 142DD53816
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 23:57:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from fabien by hawkmoon with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 17Zkc9-0001WU-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 23:57:33 -0400
From: Fabien =?iso-8859-1?q?Ni=F1oles?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [RFA]: simulpic -- a Microchip PIC simulator
X-Debbugs-CC: Fabien =?iso-8859-1?q?Ni=F1oles?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
debian-devel@lists.debian.org
X-Face: #`Gko'-Jy\ZkX3W&5Upcg64y,`90(x9qbGF6u&&,R[SYa(RK1fFeT$R[1KtGuO'3*-MRD,6
7I"C$n~/!}8TOO&~yae8%W(P&lH%R0M)N}p
Date: 30 Jul 2002 23:57:32 -0400
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 24
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: Fabien Ninoles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I'm just interested about this one, already work with it and I'm
already a debian developper. However, I no more work on PIC, so if
someone uses it currently, I let it take my place.
Thanks,
Fabien
- --=20
Fabien Ni=F1oles Debian Maintainer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org
GPG KeyID: C15D FE9E BB35 F596 127F BF7D 8F1F DFC9 BCE0 9436
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.6 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iD8DBQE9R2Aqjx/fybzglDYRAqEqAJ4xOKqBUQKlD9vy+bRg/9oqVgnYtgCeK96J
iSCdbkQoXOA57lX5gYYZZUY=3D
=3DROvE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 154906-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jan 2003 11:50:09 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 17 05:50:08 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from csiges9.insa-lyon.fr (mail.insa-lyon.fr) [134.214.79.200]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18ZV0i-0000Dt-00; Fri, 17 Jan 2003 05:50:08 -0600
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by mail.insa-lyon.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 042534B422
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 17 Jan 2003 12:49:37 +0100 (CET)
Received: from serveur.aurel32.net (F110.resF.insa-lyon.fr [134.214.165.23])
by mail.insa-lyon.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A16F64B423
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 17 Jan 2003 12:49:35 +0100 (CET)
Received: from amavis by serveur.aurel32.net with scanned-ok (Exim 3.35 #1
(Debian))
id 18ZV0C-0000P2-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 17 Jan 2003 12:49:36 +0100
Received: from pc.aurel32 ([192.168.17.10])
by serveur.aurel32.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 18ZV0A-0000Oi-00; Fri, 17 Jan 2003 12:49:34 +0100
Received: from aurel32 by pc.aurel32 with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18ZV0A-0002XE-00; Fri, 17 Jan 2003 12:49:34 +0100
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 12:49:34 +0100
From: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RFA: simulpic -- a Microchip PIC simulator
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.4i (2002-05-29)
Sender: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20020300
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=5.0
tests=PGP_SIGNATURE_2,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
--y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello,
I recently found a small bug in simulpic. I have seen this package was
orphaned (bug #154106), so I adopt it. Today I have seen you have already
filled some times ago an RFA (bug #154906) about it. Sorry for having=20
adopted the package without asking you before. If you are still
interested, let me know.
Regards,
Aurelien
--y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+J+3Ow3ao2vG823MRAtUtAJ40QIEHhoNahb2Ez7sb+F8CYn1z8wCgj2IH
iaJMUnWlIBJC0f6ir05Hwes=
=alNT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6--
