Hi Patrick, Patrick Schleizer wrote (05 Jul 2016 18:28:00 GMT) : > Is someone from the PkgPrivacyMaintainers team interested / willing to > help get corridor [4] [5] [6] into Debian?
Not me. > I: corridor source: unused-file-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright paragraph at > line 3 > https://github.com/adrelanos/corridor/blob/debian_new/debian/copyright > Any idea what is wrong in the debian/copyright file? "Multiple Files paragraphs are allowed. The last paragraph that matches a particular file applies to it. More general paragraphs should therefore be given first, followed by more specific overrides." (https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/) > Would a combined manpage, i.e. 'man corridor', symlinked to the > individual command names (corridor-init-forwarding, corridor-init-snat, > ...) be acceptable by Debian policy and otherwise or should a separate > man page per binary be provided? I guess it would be OK, but I didn't re-read Policy 12.1 in details recently. > And I never figured out how to manually figure out a mailing list > reference number and replicate it so that the thread does not break. AFAIK the bits you want are correct "In-Reply-To" and "References" headers :) Cheers, -- intrigeri
