El 7-Dec-2002 a las 12:00:40, Steve Langasek escribió: > Hello, Hi,
> On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 06:44:30PM +0100, Teófilo Ruiz Suárez wrote: > > > * Package name : pts > > Version : 0.20 > > Upstream Author : INOUE Kenji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * URL : http://ptns.sourceforge.net > > * License : GPL > > Description : Tetrinet Server Written in Perl > > > Perl TetriNET Server is a Tetrinet compatible server written in Perl. > > It supports channels, encrypted passwords, sudden death, game types > > and a bunch of other configurable parameters of gameplay. > > What are the differences between this server and the tetrinetx package > already in the archive? If ptns is added to the archive, should > tetrinetx be removed? tetrinetx is written in C, and pts in Perl as you know, anyway, I don't think that tetrinetx should be removed. I don't know if it must be a conflict, or not. I CC to the tetrinetx maintainer. > Should the package name really be 'ptns' (you have 'pts' listed above)? The package is named "pts", I think that ptns is just the subdomain in SF, may be because pts was in other project. Cheers, PS: I am already in NM, so if I don't pass the process soon, an uploader will upload my package after my AM have checked it, of course. -- Teófilo Ruiz Suárez || (teo) || Sevilla, España -------------------------------------------------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] <-> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------------------------------------- GnuPG Key ID: 420718E6 FPR: 0280 862C 064B FA76 9A1C EB64 5755 A66C 4207 18E6
pgp9vtZOjKv0U.pgp
Description: PGP signature
