On 11.12.2015 04:05, Joachim Wiedorn wrote: > Hello Rolf, > > I have seen there is a problem with the pppdcapiplugin package > because of changes of the ppp package. > > I think about overtaking isdnutils.
> What do you think about break out capiutils as standalone source > package (similar to libcapi20-3) and let isdnutils package "die"? Joachim, thank you for picking this up. The package is up for adoption so essentially you are free to do as you please. Thanks for asking. You might want to consider to do as I did which was to upload a separate new package that built and for the sake of higher version took over one of the binary packages of the old isdnutils source package. The left-over still remains. This approach requires to pass through NEW but that is the cleanest solution. isdnutils can then either continue to exist or eventually die off. I don't feel like killing it explicitly. Regards Rolf
