On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 4:06 PM, Andreas Tille <andr...@an3as.eu> wrote:
> Hi Michael, > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 11:04:33AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > > > > gpaw-setups is a dependency of gpaw and not very useful independently I > > think? So I wonder why it should be on the blends page, do we assume > > users might want to install it on its own? > > You are correct - it does not make much sense on the Blends page. I > have not verified before asking for it. I'll remove it again from the > tasks (which does not mean that I will refuse SoB for sure ;-)). > we have discussed the reason why gpaw-setups (gpaw-data) should be shipped by Debian. The discussion starts here: https://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2015/07/msg00033.html I can add that the potentials included in gpaw-data can be also read by Abinit. I CC Michael Banck on this. > > > Or is the plan to just document the dependency, but not have it show up > > there cause I don't see gpaw-setups on the physics blends web sentinel > > yet? > > > > I am not sure which format it implements for the data files it ships, is > > it some standard that could be picked up by other packages using PAW? > > Further remark on the package after having a sponsoring look: Is there > any specific reason to name the source package gpaw-setups and the > resulting binary gpaw-data. For a single binary package it is more > convenient to choose the same name for both. I'm asking just for the > sake of interest since if you decide later for a name change it needs > another pass through the new queue. > gpaw-data has been also decided during https://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2015/07/msg00033.html I think this is because similar packages, abinit-data quantum-espresso-data, used this naming convention. > > Moreover I did two commits to Git: > > 1. cme fix dpkg-control > - fixing Vcs-Browser > - fixing line breaks in long description > - does other stuff for normalinsing. > -> please do do in future or fix the resulting lintian issues > otherwise > > 2. Added missing ${misc:Depends} as lintian was asking you to do > > OK thanks. There is a new GPAW release (just today), but this requires python-ase-3.9.0 which is not in Debian yet. gpaw-data (or gpaw-setups) stays the old one. I think we just continue with GPAW-0.10.0 and make package update later. Marcin > The last commit saying "Upload to new" is not really true until you > comment on the naming choice. > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > > -- > http://fam-tille.de >
