Your message dated Mon, 28 Oct 2002 21:28:04 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line uploaded
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Oct 2002 01:40:55 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 17 20:40:54 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from fe1.rdc-kc.rr.com (mail1.kc.rr.com) [24.94.163.48] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 182M8E-0005CE-00; Thu, 17 Oct 2002 20:40:54 -0500
Received: from debian ([65.26.39.58]) by mail1.kc.rr.com  with Microsoft 
SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.757.75);
         Thu, 17 Oct 2002 20:37:12 -0500
Received: from mkc by debian with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
        id 182M8D-0002hO-00; Thu, 17 Oct 2002 20:40:53 -0500
From: Mike Coleman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RFA: subterfugue -- Tool for subverting programs--"strace meets expect"
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 20:40:53 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Mike Coleman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
        tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
        version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-10-17
Severity: normal

I'm the current maintainer and also the upstream author for this package.  The
package currently doesn't work with Python 2.2 and the automated Debian
builder just filed a bug indicating that it can't build the package.

I'm sorry to say it, but I think this package ought to simply be removed.
There seem to be very few or perhaps no users, and no other package depends on
it.

I'm filing this RFA because it looks like the correct first step to removal.
If someone would actually like to take this package and run with it, that's be
great.

Mike





The package description is:
 SUBTERFUGUE is a framework for observing and playing with the reality of
 software; it's a foundation for building tools to do tracing, sandboxing, and
 many other things.  You could think of it as "strace meets expect."
 [requires 2.4 kernel]

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux debian 2.4.19 #2 Thu Sep 12 21:32:43 CDT 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 165255-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Oct 2002 02:28:36 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 28 20:28:35 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from chcgil2-ar3-4-65-047-012.chcgil2.dsl-verizon.net 
(finbar.dyndns.org) [4.65.47.12] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 186M7P-0004zv-00; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 20:28:35 -0600
Received: by finbar.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 67934C9B7; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 21:28:04 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 21:28:04 -0500
From: Thomas Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: uploaded
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-No-CC: I subscribe to the lists i post to, please do not CC me on replies.
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-Sender-Mental-State: So bored that he writes extra mail headers
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=5.0
        tests=SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
              USER_AGENT_MUTT
        version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Yay, I have uploaded an updated version that appears to build using the
Python 2.2 idiom, and runs under 2.2.

Mike -- if you read this, thanks for the awesome package!  It is really
interesting, and I have a couple of ideas for putting things in it taken
from fuzz(1), another program manipulation tool that I maintain.

As for taking over upstream maintenance... I guess I can do that but I
really don't know Python that well, nor really C at all.  I can read
it... blah.  I think I'd rather just send you patches and stuff (I'll
start with the 2.2 building thing) at least for the time being, if
that's ok.

cheers,
 -thomas
-- 
Thomas "resc" Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
web: http://finbar.dyndns.org/
gpg key id 1024D/ACABA81E, fingerprint:
3A47 CFA5 0E5D CF4A 5B22  12D3 FF1B 84FE ACAB A81E

Reply via email to