Your message dated Mon, 28 Oct 2002 17:23:33 +1100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Getting fpm to build on Debian sid
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Sep 2002 00:20:40 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 14 19:20:40 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from snoopy.apana.org.au [203.12.237.97] (postfix)
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 17qN9U-0006pT-00; Sat, 14 Sep 2002 19:20:40 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by snoopy.apana.org.au (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id 5D327348C9; Sun, 15 Sep 2002 10:20:37 +1000 (EST)
Received: from scrooge.chocbit.org.au (scrooge.apana.org.au [203.12.237.100])
        by snoopy.apana.org.au (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id B8ACBB7DB; Sun, 15 Sep 2002 10:20:35 +1000 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by scrooge.chocbit.org.au (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id 1BD96D31E; Sun, 15 Sep 2002 10:20:33 +1000 (EST)
Received: by scrooge.chocbit.org.au (Postfix, from userid 1003)
        id D8C28D2F3; Sun, 15 Sep 2002 10:20:28 +1000 (EST)
From: Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RFA: fpm -- Password Manager
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2002 10:20:28 +1000
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tests=
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517
X-Razor-id: 758d662ba8039a71d4293915db25e9362f1f5a70
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-09-15
Severity: normal

I request an adopter for the fpm package.
The package description is:
 Figaro's Password Manager is a program that allows you to securely store the
 passwords you use on the web.

My reasons are as follows:

1. Can no longer build for unstable. I have tried hacking at
the Makefiles, etc, but it still won't build. Also I get
warnings for issues that I just fixed. eg. for some reason
the intl directory is no longer created.

2. Somebody with more understanding of Gnome, Glade, will probably
be able to fix this faster then I can.

3. This package is probably better suited to someone who
tracks unstable (as all my computers run stable). It is no longer
possible to have the same version compile on woody and unstable
due to the build-depends change (see below).

4. No active upstream maintainer.

This package contains 3 bugs, 2 which should be easy to fix, not
sure about the other one (which was forwarded upstream to the
non-active upstream maintainer.)

The version in Debian requires the build depends to be changed
from gdk-imlib-dev to gdk-imlib1-dev. I can provide my source
with my other changes if requested, but it might be better to
use the Debian version as a starting point.

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux scrooge 2.4.18 #1 Sun Jul 14 19:42:26 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 160916-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Oct 2002 06:21:52 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 28 00:21:52 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from snoopy.apana.org.au [203.12.237.97] (postfix)
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 1863Ha-0003xv-00; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 00:21:51 -0600
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by snoopy.apana.org.au (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id 567823A136; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 17:23:35 +1100 (EST)
Received: by snoopy.apana.org.au (Postfix, from userid 1003)
        id 0BE143A134; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 17:23:33 +1100 (EST)
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 17:23:33 +1100
From: Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Getting fpm to build on Debian sid
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517
X-Razor-id: 6a7b1edf874ac6a938c25791c87f50991fb47352
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-16.0 required=5.0
        tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
              SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
              USER_AGENT_MUTT
        version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Note for bug #160916.

I am going to resume maintaining fpm with help from Manuel, because
we have now got it compiling again[1].

On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 11:03:44AM +0100, Manuel Estrada Sainz wrote:
>  Would you add me to Uploaders? I follow sid, I am already subcribed to
>  fpm's pts and anyway, having more than one maintainer is a good thing.

Is it just a matter of adding:

Uploaders: Manuel Estrada Sainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

to the control file?

>  Oh, and if you don't want to be considered Non-Maintainer, you should
>  close Bug#160916.

Ok, will do so.

Notes:
[1] so far fpm has build on all platforms except s390 (CVS is
broken) and mipsel (build depends are uninstallable). These aren't
fpm's fault. Yeah!
-- 
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to