On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 10:24:57AM +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote: > * Mathias Behrle: " [tryton-debian] Bug#783029: Bug#783029: [py3porters-devel] > Packaging of suds-jurko" (Wed, 29 Apr 2015 11:46:01 +0200): >> * Lionel Elie Mamane: " Re: [tryton-debian] Bug#783029: [py3porters-devel] >> Packaging of suds-jurko" (Tue, 28 Apr 2015 16:32:23 +0200): >>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 03:27:12PM +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote: >>>> * Lionel Elie Mamane: " [tryton-debian] suds in Debian" (Tue, 28 Apr 2015 >>>> 13:24:25 +0200):
>>>>> I just uploaded the jurko fork of suds (the latter you are >>>>> maintainer of in Debian) to Debian. >>>>> The killer feature for me was compatibility with Python 3. It >>>>> installs as python module "suds", for drop-in replacement of >>>>> suds. >>>> The "killer" feature of suds-jurko those days may turn out to be >>>> that it tends to be as unmaintained as the original suds. >>> <sigh> > Time has passed and re-evaluating suds-jurko still shows no maintainer > activity. I don't get feedback on mails written directly to Jurko neither > there is action on patches or development on the bitbucket project. > So my personal decision is to not use suds-jurko as a drop-in for > suds. Further action now depends on your answer, Lionel: > Do you still want to maintain a suds-jurko package in Debian? I'm not going to turn into a new upstream for suds-jurko. Maintaining a package without an upstream is never very attractive. So let's say no. -- Lionel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150603164211.gj8...@capsaicin.mamane.lu
