Your message dated Wed, 25 Mar 2015 21:57:49 -0400
with message-id <1427335069.3502.65.ca...@mmogp.com>
and subject line Retracting ITP
has caused the Debian Bug report #781173,
regarding ITP: crmsh -- Command-line interface for High-Availability cluster
management on GNU/Linux systems
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
781173: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=781173
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Richard B Winters <r...@mmogp.com>
* Package name : crmsh
Version : 2.2.0~rc2+git.115.g0e24f25
Upstream Author : Dejan Muhamedagic <de...@suse.de>, Kristoffer Gronlund
<kgronl...@suse.com>
* URL : https://github.com/ClusterLabs/crmsh
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: Python
Description : CLI for HA cluster management
Command-line interface for High-Availability cluster
management on GNU/Linux systems
crmsh is one of several command-line interfaces for managing
the pacemaker/corosync High-Availability cluster stack. It was
at one time bundled with cman, but as cman is no longer used or
supported in the modern stack; crmsh needs its own package.
RHEL only used cman until corosync was able to handle quorum
on its own. In Debian, crmsh is bundled with cman. Both are
considered out-of-date.
I've authored changes upstream, and plan to keep in close
contact with the upstream team. I intend to maintain this
package via sponsorship - unless debian-ha would like to
sponsor the package and allow me to join the team.
If debian-ha is inactive, though, I'd like to get it going
again. It will be uploaded to mentors.debian.org if nothing
else, and awaiting sponsorship.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hello,
I did not intend to submit an ITP with the same package already existing
in the repository (unstable).
I used BugReport, and checked wnpp, as well as apt-cache policy, and I
promise I did not get crmsh listed at all.
Paul Wise explained to me the error (searching wnpp, my bug was the only
bug filed there), and BugReport I did not use a filter. I still do not
understand why apt-cache policy didn't pick it up, but regardless I wish
to apologize, and to the maintainers; I offer my help :)
Best,
--
Rik
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---