Hi! [ Hmm, I've only seen this now in the BTS, as it seems my spam filters in master eat this email. :/ ]
On Sun, 2014-11-09 at 21:35:21 -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > I don't want to maintain dpkg-repack upstream. Ok, thanks for clarifying! One last question, there seems to be some discrepancy between the license stated in debian/copyright and the license blurb in the perl script. Would you sign off on the attached patch? Thanks, Guillem
From 3622c5d33a319b22dec07619dda216213c304390 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Guillem Jover <guil...@debian.org> Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 13:05:25 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Update license blurb in dpkg-repack to match the one in debian/copyright The latter states that the code is under GPL-2+, but the former does not mention the "or later" clause. --- dpkg-repack | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/dpkg-repack b/dpkg-repack index eea4ddf..61ed6cc 100755 --- a/dpkg-repack +++ b/dpkg-repack @@ -6,7 +6,8 @@ # # This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify # it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by -# the Free Software Foundation. +# the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or +# (at your option) any later version. # # This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, # but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of -- 2.1.3
