On 11/01/2014 07:58 PM, Guido Günther wrote: > Is this going to be part of the package description?
Yes. > It looks more > like a rant about what Nose already provides than what > python-nose-parameterized has to offer: > >> Nose. It's got test generators. But they kind of suck: >> * They often require a second function >> * They make it difficult to separate the data from the test >> * They don't work with subclases of unittest.TestCase >> * kwargs? What kwargs? > > It be much nicer if the description would highlight what > python-nose-parameterized actually does (i.e. what the decorators are > useful for). Obviously, nose-parameterized addresses these issues... I welcome you to provide a better package description. If upstream doesn't take the time to write a better one, well sorry, but I don't really have the time either, I just packaged that one because I needed python-nose-timer to get in, and it depends on it (and I need nose-timer to package Fuel). If you do have the time, then great! I'll be happy to integrate a better package description on the next upload. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54554083.4000...@debian.org
