Am Freitag, 25. Juli 2014, 18:23:38 schrieb Serge Hallyn: > Quoting Thomas Goirand (z...@debian.org): > > Then, reading #754910, it looked like Serge was about to work with > > Daniel, but finally, didn't. No sign of this change in #754910, which is > > at least surprising. It's also very surprising to see the package just > > As Daniel said we had an agreement. He was going to push the package. He > failed to do that, causing over a week's delay in straightening out the > non-systemd-upgrade mess. But instead of dropping in on that thread and > apologizing, he's complaining here.
My experience is that is usually does not work expecting someone else to apologize, before having apologized oneself for the part of the behavior that contributed to the undesirable outcome. > I have enough to do that when I can delegate something to someone else I'm > happy and thankful to them. Last week I was hoping that would be the > situation here. Alas. Please talk to one another assuming everyone had good intentions. Daniel who maintains a ton of packages started to orphan them (see debian- devel-changes). I bet thats not the intended outcome. To me this conflict does not appear to be unsolvable. Please try to resolve it. A good step would be if one side starts to say "I am sorry" for some of their behavior that could have been rude. Usually both sides have their share in a conflict. Daniel, please reconsider / stop orphaning your packages. I really appreciate your immense packaging effort! I just maintain some little packages and help with bug reports and testing, but I am really worried by whats happening here. Thanks, -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/6253135.B98bYcQPtz@merkaba
