Hi,

Rene Engelhard wrote:
[...]
> I suppose that this is fixed in 0.62b.
> I'll probably close this report in the next days...

sorry for that, there was a typo in the bug#, 78 instead of 87.
Of course, I'll not close this buf.

Regards,

Rene
-- 
Rene Engelhard
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG-Key-ID: 248AEB73 | FPr: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB  7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73

Attachment: pgpWl5dqYyXky.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to