Le 27/02/2014 12:24, Johannes Schauer a écrit : >> Have you considered joining the OCaml team on Alioth[1], and put your >> packaging as a git repository there[2]? >> >> [1] https://alioth.debian.org/projects/pkg-ocaml-maint/ >> [2] dom-new-git-repo(1), in package dh-ocaml > > I committed my current status of packaging to ocp-intent.git
Good. >> I started to have a look, and for sure the copyright file is incorrect. >> There is a lot of copyright to "Jun Furuse" and OCamlPro, those two should at >> least be mentioned. Actually, I didn't see (after a quick look) any copyright >> owned by the ones you mentioned in debian/copyright (Thomas and Fabrice work >> for OCamlPro and/or Inria, but the copyright seems to belong to the company >> and Inria). There are also some other bits from other people, you have to be >> sure that at least license is the same. > > The copyright issue has now been clarified by upstream [1] and I integrated it > into debian/copyright. Good. >> I am still reviewing the technical part, but I preferred to tell you about >> the copyright issue first. >> >> Thank you for your contribution! > > I hope the packaging is not too bad. Please tell me the things that are left > to > fix. Why do you add libocp-indent-lib-ocaml as explicit dependency to ocp-indent? Isn't the one inferred by dh_ocaml enough? If you put META and $foo.cma in a runtime package, there should also be $foo.cmxs there (on native architectures). Otherwise, not having a runtime package at all is fine for pure OCaml libraries. There are no *.cmx files installed. Do you know if that's intentional? Cheers, -- Stéphane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53186d11.60...@debian.org
