On Sunday 23 February 2014 20:32:10 Axel Wagner wrote: > I agree with Gergely Nagy, that this is a > little bit puzzling, but warranted given that the gem is called that.
Agreed. Better stick with a consistent naming with respect to upstream gem names. Even if the resulting name is lackluster. We faced a similar issue in perl group and ended up with package ending with -perl-perl :-/, like libmodern-perl-perl. All the best -- https://github.com/dod38fr/ -o- http://search.cpan.org/~ddumont/ http://ddumont.wordpress.com/ -o- irc: dod at irc.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2290602.5r2HOg3q0y@ylum