Hi, Mario J. Barchéin Molina wrote: > > On you https://github.com/intelligenia/mssh you declare this to be > > version 1.2.1. Do you intend to continue development of mssh in > > general? > > I'm not experienced in C or GTK+ so I don't think I can take this project, > sorry.
Same here. > I bumped minor version just to state this code is based on and > improves original one. That's ok, I'd say. > If this is confusing, I can remove tags from github's repo. I'm fine with that. It just suggested to me that you might do further development. And I actually read it there, not in the tags: https://github.com/intelligenia/mssh#changelog > > As you may know, Bradley maintained mssh upstream as well as in Debian > > and hence maintaining the Debian package would have meant maintaining > > the upstream which code -- which I don't feel capable of. But if mssh > > has a proper upstream maintainer again, I'd also maintain or > > co-maintain its Debian package. (Cc'ing the "O: mssh" bug report for > > adding this information.) > > I'm glad this package is maintained. That's the point: It's _not_ really maintained. I can and will only maintain it in Debian properly _if_ someone else is willing to maintain it upstream as I can't do that. I currently just try to fix the worst issues under the hat of the Debian QA Group. > I saw "orphaned" when filling the report That's still the case. > and this is a package I use really a lor in everyday job. Same here. Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE `- | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131118171027.gi13...@sym.noone.org
