Hi there again.
On Sep 02 2013, Rogério Brito wrote:
> I wonder if, somehow, changing to team-maintenance wouldn't be better for
> the package overall? Perhaps the highly skilled people that already package
> Java things for Debian may be interested in this? I'm CCing them.
>
> Otherwise, changing the status from ITP to RFP would free people to work on
> it instead of the "deadlock" here. After all, the original bug was filed on
> "1 Dec 2011" which will soon complete 2 years! (I almost did this without
> asking for other people's opinions).
OK, I just went ahead and removed this ITP and owned thing.
If that was premature, then just modify it again, but, please, keep the bug
updated with events/progress of the packaging, so other people are not left
wondering what the status of the packaging is and can actually work on the
darned thing.
Regards,
--
Rogério Brito : rbrito@{ime.usp.br,gmail.com} : GPG key 4096R/BCFCAAAA
http://cynic.cc/blog/ : github.com/rbrito : profiles.google.com/rbrito
DebianQA: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=rbrito%40ime.usp.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130906061056.ga2...@ime.usp.br
