Hi Norbert et al., Am Mittwoch, den 04.09.2013, 10:00 +0900 schrieb Norbert Preining: > For now we can upload. As long as the TeX Live package do not > ship symlinks to the new fonts nothing happens. > > On the usptream (TeX Live) (I am also maintainer there) I will see if > we can prepare an updated package for CTAN with the exact fonts, > which would solve the problem automatically.
It would be great if you could take care upstream that texlive is made compatible with the new urw-base35 fonts release. > Bottom line: Is there anything else before I should sponsor this package? I'd say "no", but I am sure that a huge glaring bug will occur the second after the package is uploaded. :) > One more thing - I *agree* (for now at least) that *chanigng > the /FontName > is *not* a good idea. By this you mean that changing the /FontName fields *back* to the values of the old gsfonts package is a bad idea? Alright, then we just keep the font files untouched. Thank you for sposoring already! - Fabian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1378282503.6135.10.ca...@kff50.ghi.rwth-aachen.de
