Your message dated Mon, 22 Jul 2002 18:54:45 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#153884: O: gambc
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jul 2002 15:56:55 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 22 10:56:55 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from debian30.math.uwaterloo.ca (debian30.math) [129.97.82.27] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17WfYN-0002Nj-00; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 10:56:55 -0500
Received: from wtautz by debian30.math with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 17WfYK-0004pj-00; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 11:56:52 -0400
From: Walter Tautz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: O: gambc
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 11:56:52 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Walter Tautz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-07-22
Severity: normal
There use to be a package called gambc in potato. Contains
the Gambit-C compiler available at
http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~gambit/
The previous maintainer Karl M. Hegbloom sent me the following:
On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 08:27, Walter Tautz wrote:
> Hello, I just noticed that gambc is not in woody or unstable.
> Do you plan to provide a gambc package (I believe there is
> a version 4? ...not sure about that)
No. AFAIK, it's up for adoption.
However it does not appear to be listed in the orphaned packages...
maybe I didn't look to closely....
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux debian30.math 2.4.18-bf2.4 #1 Sam Mär 30 00:56:06 CET 2002 i586
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 153884-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jul 2002 16:54:48 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 22 11:54:48 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gtso-c3477b5b.dsl.mediaways.net (mail.frosty-geek.net)
[195.71.123.91]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17WgSN-0007C6-00; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 11:54:47 -0500
Received: by mail.frosty-geek.net (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 2DAEC2FF02; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 18:54:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by fisch.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id DB4BB22E66; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 18:54:45 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 18:54:45 +0200
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Walter Tautz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#153884: O: gambc
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Walter Tautz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-22 11:56]:
> No. AFAIK, it's up for adoption.
>
> However it does not appear to be listed in the orphaned packages...
> maybe I didn't look to closely....
It used to be up for adoption. However, the package was removed
because no one adopted it after a long time.
(If you want to see gambc in Debian again, this bug should be changed
to an RFP; let me know if you want this.)
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
