Hi Jonas,
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 03:01:21AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > In case there might be reasons to stick to the current 1.x series and
> > it makes sense to package 2.x in addition instead of simply upgrading
> > I would welcome if you would choose the Debian Med repository for
> > doing so (any DD has commit permissions) and set Debian Med team as
> > maintainer.
>
> staden and staden-io-lib are not the same thing. In fact, staden (some
> applications) depends on staden-io-lib (library implementing read-write
> routines for some file formats) - which explains why I bumped into some
> issues with the libraries leading to bugreports ;-)
Ahh, I should have checked this before sending this mail.
> Nevertheless, if the Debian Med team has a low-volume mailinglist and
I have no idea what might be your limit for low-volume - there are some
mails per day thought. If you are only interested in this specific
package you might consider just subscribing this package via PTS as
alternative.
> don't mind my use of CDBS for packaging,
I admit I tend to convert from cdbs to dh but we have several packages
left with cdbs. Finally we are not that kind of people who would try to
convert the cdbs maintainer to something else. ;-)
> I will be happy to have staden
> be part of that team.
This would be really cool.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130531054909.ga14...@an3as.eu
