On Fri, 2013-03-15 at 21:13 +1100, Andrew Harvey wrote: > I've just pushed some updates to the packaging to clean it up and > updated to the latest upstream version. Cool! I was beginning to think about hijacking it.
> I'm happy to maintain it (unless upstream makes big changes which make > harder to package). However a DD will need to sponsor it's upload if we > want it included in Debian. > > Lastly, my apologies to Laszlo who offered to sponsor it's upload back > in August last year, but I never got around to fixing up the package. > Hopefully the latest updates I've made will mean it can be sponsored and > uploaded into Debian. Sure, it looks OK. Still, there's some things to fix. Why do you use Java 6? Java 7 is in Debian now, see the openjdk-7-jre package. Copyright format is now official, please use its format line[1]. BSD-2 license text lines are too long, please use a 80 chars width one. It would be nice to 'beautify' debian/rules . The second line can show the file format if set to: '# -*- makefile -*-'. Override targets should be listed in the '.PHONY: ...' line at the end. The debian/watch is essentially empty, delete it or make use of it. Worst is that JMapViewer_Demo.jar is empty, contains only MANIFEST.MF . Is it an upstream build problem? Cheers, Laszlo/GCS [1] http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1363361523.18357.57.camel@julia
