On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 03:33:44PM +0200, Yann Dirson wrote: > mdz wrote: > > I think that it could be a very important free software tool > > How does this compare to ltt, which I already packaged ?
Wasn't aware of it. Looks like it requires a kernel patch. > > Heh...agreed, a kernel module is tricky compared to recompilation or > > wrapper libraries, but tame compared to a full-fledged kernel patch. > > A bit off-topic, but well... If you use dh-kpatches for a kernel patch, > I'd rather says that kernel patches are now easy to package - just look at > the number of those in woody as compared with potato :) I wasn't talking about packaging; I agree that dh-kpatches makes the job easy. However, it requires more effort and commitment from the user. I am always reluctant to use software which requires that I rebuild my kernel and reboot in order to use it, and do the same for any other machine on which I choose to use it. -- - mdz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
