Hi, On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Vasudev Kamath wrote: > I did some more investigation and I don't see any file name clash > betweek zim from zim-wiki and zimlib. Even though both packages have zim > in the package name there is description field which clarifies any > confusion between both packages for end user. > > So I guess renaming from upstream is not required. Please share your > thoughts.
My thoughts are "I have been confused and thus I believe that other users will be confused in the future". This is why I believe it's best to rename. Furthermore, there are no file clashes yet, but the day where someone will write a python wrapper for "zimlib" (and this is on the roadmap apparently), it might become a real issue. That said, I'm not here to impose anything to anyone. I just wanted to inform you so that both upstream are aware of the potential conflict and so that they can handle it properly. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Get the Debian Administrator's Handbook: → http://debian-handbook.info/get/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130114210030.ga15...@x230-buxy.home.ouaza.com
