Your message dated Tue, 16 Apr 2002 15:59:13 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#143011: epic4-script-light should not release with woody
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Dec 2001 05:20:32 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 08 23:20:32 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (piro.kabuki.sfarc.net) [203.36.158.121] (postfix)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16CwO7-00064Q-00; Sat, 08 Dec 2001 23:20:32 -0600
Received: by piro.kabuki.sfarc.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id D207414AC97C; Sun, 9 Dec 2001 16:20:25 +1100 (EST)
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 16:20:24 +1100
From: Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: O: epic4-script-light -- Light - It's Just Not Lame
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: wnpp
Unfortunately, Light *is* rather lame. It's a nice script, but is very
buggy and unmaintained upstream. I don't want it. Just be wary of
picking it up.
-d
--=20
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<Coma> bind is like playdoh :)
<sjh> ooohh kinky "Im so hot you could mould me like a caching dns server"
--n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iEYEARECAAYFAjwS9JgACgkQcPClnTztfv2PXQCfUdSs8LCtkMZ/0mIpj+cI+/Qf
/CkAn3KwNDHEXLRRwSnk69tIQFqrOLu9
=QrOI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 123028-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Apr 2002 06:26:36 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 16 01:26:36 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (piro.kabuki.sfarc.net) [203.36.158.121] (postfix)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16xMQF-0002oy-00; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 01:26:36 -0500
Received: by piro.kabuki.sfarc.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id BD58714AC963; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 16:26:32 +1000 (EST)
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 15:59:13 +1000
From: Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#143011: epic4-script-light should not release with woody
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i
Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 16:26:32 +1000
Resent-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 05:31:20PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> epic4-script-light has been orphaned for 127 days (see #123028) and
> has never been part of a stable release of Debian. Since the future
> of this package is not clear, I think that woody should release
> without it. This bug will keep the package out of testing; the
> package will stay in unstable.
>=20
> If you do not agree with this, please close this bug immediately.
Damn straight I don't agree with it, being the current Maintainer and
all, having done a few uploads recently. I must've forgotten to close
the bug, because this package is very much alive and active. I was
hoping for someone else to take it over (hi Stephen!) so I could fully
jump out of Debian, but hey.
--=20
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
KDE: It's the new black! http://www.kd=
e.org
Kopete (multi-protocol IM client) Developer http://www.kdedevelopers.net/k=
opete
--3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iEYEARECAAYFAjy7vbEACgkQcPClnTztfv0hogCeO/CL1fg/7u09856dUMwH+6Xo
Jg8AoJJKMFknpnMdsTCTWNioVDM8oROK
=q+Sx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
