Joey Hess <jo...@debian.org> writes: > Kees Cook wrote: >> If the "ABI" of the dh_* tools is considered stable and exportable, I have >> no problem with this. If debhelper will change its "ABI" in the future, >> then this separate package is going to be a pain to maintain. > > Debhelper has had a stable, documented ABI for 12+ years; > there are numerous dh_* commands elsewhere in the archive.
Yup, this is the reason I dared raising the option in the first place. (Though, even if this weren't the case, I'd be up for helping maintain such a package, but thankfully, doing so would be an easy job.) So, if I understand it well, there is no opposition? Then we "only" need a package name, possibly finding other scripts apart from dh_apparmor (perhaps even poking the maintainers of various dh_* scripts if they'd consider merging into a single thing), and a maintainer (I'm willing to help with that, but the more the merrier, especially if there's someone more versed in dh-land than I am). -- |8] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/878vlxd3gv....@luthien.mhp
