Your message dated Tue, 2 Apr 2002 21:19:34 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line beroftpd, Ivan Stojic [was: Re: Unidentified subject!]
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at quiet) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Aug 2000 00:14:21 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 31 19:14:21 2000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mmagallo by master.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian))
id 13JPhL-00017x-00; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 19:14:19 -0500
From: "Ivan Stojic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: "Ivan Stojic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ITP: beroftpd
X-Mailer: feedbts -- Flames to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Marcelo Magallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2000 19:14:19 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Submitted: 19990110
The person listed as the submitter of this bug has stated his intention to
package beroftpd.
If you are interested in this package, and the ITP was submited a long time
ago (3 months or so), the prospective maintainer can be reached via
[EMAIL PROTECTED] If you contact him, please remember to be
polite, Debian maintainers are volunteers, and Read Life has the nasty habit
of getting in the way. Once you upload the package and it's installed on the
archive, please remember to close this bug (or include a Closes: bug#nnnnn
statement on your changelog).
This report was automatically fed into the BTS database. The original
submission date to the WNPP system was 19990110.
You are getting a copy of this mail because your emai address was
listed on the WNPP as the person who submited the original request to the
system.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 68273-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Apr 2002 19:19:41 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 02 13:19:41 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gtso-c3477b5b.dsl.mediaways.net (mail.frosty-geek.net)
[195.71.123.91]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16sToj-0002mZ-00; Tue, 02 Apr 2002 13:19:41 -0600
Received: by mail.frosty-geek.net (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 65EB846C1AB; Tue, 2 Apr 2002 21:19:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by fisch.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 8779122C54; Tue, 2 Apr 2002 21:19:34 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 21:19:34 +0200
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: beroftpd, Ivan Stojic [was: Re: Unidentified subject!]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20020209 15:19]:
> > retitle 68273 RFP: beroftpd -- No description
> > thanks
>
> Actually, this could probably be closed, since beroftpd was IIRC a wu-ftpd
> fork that got merged into wu proper later.
This is correct.
3. What is BeroFTPD ?
BeroFTPD was a derivative of wu-ftpd with extra functionality
for virtual hosts. Patches from the VR versions were
included. The enhancments from BeroFTPD are now incorporated
into the main daemon.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
