Hi, Few months ago, I had a try with Google pinyin. But I gave up, because it wasn't good enough: it crashed, and couldn't guess words based on the one you typed before, because upstream code simply didn't have the feature that wasn't ported from the Java version. At the time, GooglePinyin wasn't remotely comparable to the Windows version.
So, I am wondering, is GooglePinyin better now, and can it be remotely compared to SunPinyin, which is well maintained already, and that I've been using for a very long time? Aren't we seeing too many input methods in Debian, for no real benefits (just see how many pinyin methods we have...)? I'm not willing to point fingers at here, just trying to understand what you are doing, making sure that GooglePinyin is valuable enough, and that we don't have better options already (eg: sunpinyin, which already has a pretty good grammar analysis to predict words). Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e69897d.8040...@goirand.fr
