Hi together, John H. Robinson, IV wrote on Thu, 2 Dec 2010 11:17:02 -0800: > Gürkan Sengün wrote: > > Okay no responses, nobody wants to package it. I will try... > > > > Would anyone mind if I called the package just windowmaker? > > Otherwise I'll call it windowmaker-crm > > Please don't; I am working with Carlos to make the -crm branch the > actual bona fide Windowmaker.
Gennady Kupava wrote on Mon, 11 Jul 2011 22:53:21 +0400: > Guys, any news on this? Yes, the maintainer is MIA, the package has been orphaned on 6th of July 2011. See http://bugs.debian.org/632875 for the details. The last two uploads (2010-Apr-09, 2009-Jul-03) were non-maintainer uploads, anyway. See http://packages.qa.debian.org/w/wmaker.html for details. So we can and should ignore John's comment about working on packaging the -crm branch... Nobody currently really cares about Windowmaker in Debian. So If you _do_ care about Windowmaker in Debian, you should change that by stepping up and help getting the package back in shape, probably by switching to the -crm branch as upstream project. (For those who are reading the Cc of this mail to the orphaning bug report, see http://bugs.debian.org/583734 for details.) > Guy who wanted to package it, please do it, half of the year have > passed since integration started :) I think with the current situation, the best way is to adopt the current wmaker package instead of creating an new package as this is no more necessary Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE `- | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110830132132.gs29...@sym.noone.org
