On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 08:33:06PM +0200, Yiannis Kakavas wrote: > I admit I didn't pay much attention to formality, aiming at > functionality as soon as possible, but I guess the changes needed to > conform to debian policy are not that many. Currently lintian outputs > these warnings > > W: creepy source: maintainer-script-lacks-debhelper-token debian/postinst > W: creepy source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.8.4 (current is 3.9.1) > W: creepy: debian-changelog-line-too-long line 1 > W: creepy: wrong-bug-number-in-closes l94:#nnnn > W: creepy: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/creepymap > > and also there is the matter of how python applications should be > packaged in debian ( currently I use python-support )
So I am relatively ignorant of the Python policies, but I believe that easy_install in the postinst is a no-no. Could someone please correct me or elaborate? > I'd be more than happy to help in any way Great news. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110330184212.ga21...@scru.org
